Designing pedagogical Prompt for AI based on structural problem-solving thinking to develop creative thinking in teaching - A semi-experimental study
Abstract
Tóm tắt
Article Details
References
Altshuller, G. S. (1984). Creativity as an Exact Science: The Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems. Gordon and Breach.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.
Brown, T. B., et al. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Nguyễn, T. D. (2026). Đề xuất mô hình dạy học đồng sáng tạo kết hợp con người - TRIZ - AI chatbot trong dạy học Tin học. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 26(13), 78–84.
Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
Kojima, T., et al. (2022). Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11916.
Liu, P., et al. (2023). Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9), 1–35.
Luckin, R., et al. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson.
Mann, D., & Smith, G. (2010). Applying structured creative thinking to education and training. Procedia Engineering, 9, 354–362.
Salamatov, Y. (1999). TRIZ: The Right Solution at the Right Time. Insytec.
Wei, J., et al. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35.