Thiết kế prompt sư phạm cho AI dựa trên tư duy giải quyết vấn đề có cấu trúc, nhằm phát triển tư duy sáng tạo trong dạy học - Một nghiên cứu bán thực nghiệm
Abstract
Tóm tắt
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Altshuller, G. S. (1984). Creativity as an exact science: The theory of the solution of inventive problems. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Avogadri, S., & Russo, D. (2025). On opportunities and challenges of large language models and GPT for problem solving and TRIZ education. In D. Cavallucci, S. Brad, & P. Livotov (Eds.), World conference of AI-powered innovation and inventive design: 24th IFIP WG 5.4 International TRIZ Future Conference, TFC 2024, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, November 6–8, 2024, proceedings, Part I (pp. 193–204). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75919-2_12
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901.
Čok, V., Motte, D., Hmina, K., El Hassani, I., Demšar, I., Tavčar, J., & Vukašinović, N. (2026). Evaluating TRIZ with and without LLM support: An experimental study on engineering problem-solving. Proceedings of the Design Society, 6, 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2026.10409
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Iqbal, M. S., Rahim, Z. A., & Omerkhel, Q. (2025). Harnessing generative AI for educational innovation: A TRIZ-PLR perspective. Discover Applied Sciences, 7, Article 789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07467-3
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kojima, T., Gu, S. S., Reid, M., Matsuo, Y., & Iwasawa, Y. (2022). Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 22199–22213. https://doi.org/10.52202/068431-1613
Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., & Neubig, G. (2023). Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9), Article 195. https://doi.org/10.1145/3560815
Nguyễn Thế Dũng. (2026). Đề xuất mô hình dạy học đồng sáng tạo kết hợp con người - TRIZ - AI chatbot trong dạy học Tin học. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 26(13), 78–84.
Salamatov, Y. (1999). TRIZ: The right solution at the right time: A guide to innovative problem solving. Insytec.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E. H., Le, Q. V., & Zhou, D. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 24824–24837. https://doi.org/10.52202/068431-1800